So Bad It's Good FoRuM
https://sbig.dead-donkey.com/

avs2xvid.bat with Lux presets
https://sbig.dead-donkey.com/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=8128		 Page 3 of 20
Author:  elguaxo [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:48 am ]
Post subject: 
Lux Delux wrote:
Trying it on Bloodrayne too then :D :ele:

:lol:

You will win the "Encode of the Year Award" for Bloodrayne! :furlick:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:51 am ]
Post subject: 
:pisslaugh:

Hey I gotta make Kristanna Loken's nipples shiny :lol:

Hmmm but I think it might not be the source. Who knows, perhaps the SAP version of 6of9 also is more compressible like heini become! :beh:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:08 am ]
Post subject: 
Absolutely the same thing with Bloodrayne

V3 1/1/1 - 7,71 mb

6of9 1/1/1 - 7,75 mb

:eek:

Which means hq presets now get a major change! I'll upload the new package as soon Ass I complete the tests with Jawor 1cd I talked bout earlier! :beh:
Author:  BadBugs [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:25 am ]
Post subject: 
just a thought... I appreciate what youre doing here lux & I'm sure everyones gonna love your new presets but.....
from what I'm noticing from watching you in action, its becoming apparent that no matter what you do, there will always be an exception to the rule :fouet: :die:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:28 am ]
Post subject: 
Well it's pretty late here, 4:30 am :eek:

Gonna up the package soon and then hit the sack.

Changes made I'll need to re-visit later:

J2cd replaced with heini 2/1.62/0, theory makes me believe it should offer the same compression :fishy:

I'll test 6of9 2/1.62/0 (v3hr replacement) on Bloodrayne full encode tomorrow.

J1CD 1/1/1 sample test was less compressible than V3LR 2/1.62/0, that one got me confused.

Oh and dunno what to do with MPEG but I guess it's a nice middle :stupid: :party:
Author:  BadBugs [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:34 am ]
Post subject: 
you need a holiday luxy, take a break from the PC for a coupla weeks & go dance yourself into lots of sexy hot chicks panties in Ibiza, you deserve it :muf: :na: :huge: :cheerl:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:39 am ]
Post subject: 
Heh, thanks, but I was already wearing womens clothing drunk 2 days ago :D :lol:

Anyways I updated the package, and for now I guess 55 and 95 can be ignored, until I crap out something half ass decent cause my eyelids are closing and my anus feels too sober :eek:

Good night :slap: :bye: :gayb:
Author:  BadBugs [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:42 am ]
Post subject: 
sweet dreams & go get yourself laid & stop dreaming encodes, its unhealthy, better to be dreaming of nipple, mmmmmm :tits: :ba:
Author:  elguaxo [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:51 am ]
Post subject: 
V undersized by the same amount of MBs using the new LUX-85. I will try a larger comptest later today.
Author:  Lux Delux [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:56 am ]
Post subject: 
This gonna be interesting :ele:

I've got an hour before I head for work so am testing again just so I confirm if 6of9 2/1.62/0 really is the replacement for v3hr :teeth:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:38 pm ]
Post subject: 
Shit, seems I was wrong, new package up. V3HR is back inside after heini and so is J2CD.

V3 is though replaced by 6of9 2/1.62/0, I'll test that on a full encode soon enough.

Also put, for between J1CD and V3LR...- J1CD with -2 b-vop :fishy:

I think the steps from Heini to max heini_lr6of9 makes sense now, having a nice range between compression levels. Now to figure out the exact percent ranges for usage.

Let's see about that 6% comptest :D
Author:  elguaxo [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:45 pm ]
Post subject: 
Lux Delux wrote:
Let's see about that 6% comptest :D


Just change this:
Code:
SelectRangeEvery^(466, 14^)


to this:
Code:
SelectRangeEvery^(233, 14^)

:ele:

The automatic loading of a LUX preset after finishing the comptest is still not working, but at least it suggests the right LEVEL.
Author:  elguaxo [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:39 pm ]
Post subject: 
elguaxo wrote:
The automatic loading of a LUX preset after finishing the comptest is still not working, but at least it suggests the right LEVEL.


Don't write:
Lux Delux wrote:
3) inside the .txt file write

Code:
COMPTEST sizeMB


where size is the size of your video, like 1162MB for example.


use:
Code:
COMPTEST-CT sizeMB


or
Code:
LUX-CT sizeMB


And this is the new version (I downloaded your latest pack and updated some lines inside the .bat): http://maxupload.com/F72D1AAF

Edit: you already wrote the LUX-CT in the first post! :beh:
Author:  elguaxo [ Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:43 pm ]
Post subject: 
V: after the new 6% comptest the result was still 108. As I said earlier the encode with the new and old LUX-85 were nice, but a bit undersized. Modifying the script a bit I could fix it or I could use LUX-90.

I think LUX-80/90 is an interesinting area. After more tests we could see if this needs more adjustments:

89-100 - LUX-80
101-109 - LUX-85
110-120 - LUX-90
Author:  Lux Delux [ Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:09 am ]
Post subject: 
thanks for modfying, me grabs ;)

elguaxo wrote:
V: after the new 6% comptest the result was still 108. As I said earlier the encode with the new and old LUX-85 were nice, but a bit undersized. Modifying the script a bit I could fix it or I could use LUX-90.

I think LUX-80/90 is an interesinting area. After more tests we could see if this needs more adjustments:

89-100 - LUX-80
101-109 - LUX-85
110-120 - LUX-90


so same comptest result with 6% ? :beh:

Hmmm yes all the presets would need more testing, my encodes take sooo long :sad:

It seems I'll get undersizing with comptest result 73%. Which means I used V3LR. I consider that a good thing. :pooper:

Perhaps we don't need a preset between jwr1cd and V3LR at all ?
Author:  elguaxo [ Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:29 am ]
Post subject: 
BTW, the quants for V using the new LUX-85 were these:
Code:
[ DRF analysis ]

Average DRF: 2.731325
Standard deviation: 0.618195
Max DRF: 4

DRF{2:      0 (  0.000 %)                         
DRF=2:  68920 ( 36.151 %) #########               
DRF=3: 104024 ( 54.565 %) ##############           
DRF=4:  17699 (  9.284 %) ##                       
DRF}4:      0 (  0.000 %)                         

I-VOPs average DRF: 2.000797
I-VOPs std. deviation: 0.028222
I-VOPs max DRF: 3

P-VOPs average DRF: 2.307355
P-VOPs std. deviation: 0.461510
P-VOPs max DRF: 4

B-VOPs average DRF: 3.191788
B-VOPs std. deviation: 0.393707
B-VOPs max DRF: 4


And it looks great :pooper:
I think I'm going to do less denoising and try LUX-85 one more time.
Author:  Lux Delux [ Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:46 am ]
Post subject: 
Damn, I wish it was another movie which doesn't have an AFR already :D

My windows crashed and never got my V3LR encode completed now :sad: :sad: :sad:

Oh well, would undersize anyways.... /me increases resoution :pork:

Oh and I just made a nice 5 minute d2v, great for making tests me thinks ^^
Author:  Lux Delux [ Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:08 am ]
Post subject: 
Uploaded the updated package :cheer:

You bastard! :p You put 6% comptest in there and now I gotta wait extra long. And it's running at 0.39 fps :sad: :sad: :sad: :sad:

:oh:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Wed Jun 20, 2007 1:59 am ]
Post subject: 
Uhmmm something strange is happening here....

When shit starts running it tells me threads requested 26 and threads in use 26. Then it doesn't start encoding the first pass but automatically jumps to 2nd and says it's done.

WTF? :grrr:

Can it be that I can't have 1 encode and a comptest running at the same time after I updated ? :stupid:

Gonna restart windows again, whadda hell, hope it's just a bug :sad:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:14 am ]
Post subject: 
I removed xvidcore.dll from the bin and now the encode is running fine. :fishy:

But didn't before say xvid_encraw something instead of now xvid-1.2.0-dev in the .bat encoding window? :fishy:
Author:  elguaxo [ Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:26 am ]
Post subject: 
Interesting. It runs fine on my machine, but someone at DXC is testing this too and he had problems.

xvidcore.dll should be optional then.
Author:  Lux Delux [ Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:29 am ]
Post subject: 
I guess it's a problem with older machines like mine then. Oh well at least it's running now :D

Dunno why it says bitrate 1852, right to the number of frames to encode. I mean the theoretical bitrate in this instance should be ~2000. Oh well, guess I just pooped myself or something.

:dancer:
Author:  elguaxo [ Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:53 pm ]
Post subject: 
hank_quinlan at divxclasico just tried your baby turds. He was aiming for a 1/2DVD encode. The comptest suggested LUX-80 and the results were perfect! No undersize and these are the quants:
Code:
I-VOPs:  1063 (  0.723 %)                         
P-VOPs: 73560 ( 50.026 %) #############           
B-VOPs: 72418 ( 49.249 %) ############             
S-VOPs:     0 (  0.000 %)                         
N-VOPs:     3 (  0.002 %)                         
 
Max consecutive B-VOPs: 1
 
[ DRF analysis ]
 
Average DRF: 2.925558
Standard deviation: 0.633716
Max DRF: 4
 
DRF{2:     0 (  0.000 %)                         
DRF=2: 35406 ( 24.079 %) ######                   
DRF=3: 87175 ( 59.286 %) ###############         
DRF=4: 24460 ( 16.635 %) ####                     
DRF}4:     0 (  0.000 %)                         
 
I-VOPs average DRF: 2.004703
I-VOPs std. deviation: 0.068421
I-VOPs max DRF: 3
 
P-VOPs average DRF: 2.533659
P-VOPs std. deviation: 0.500063
P-VOPs max DRF: 4
 
B-VOPs average DRF: 3.337153
B-VOPs std. deviation: 0.472737
B-VOPs max DRF: 4


Screenshots:
Image Image Image

:yum:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Wed Jun 20, 2007 9:19 pm ]
Post subject: 
Heya that's good news :ele: :bun:

BTW there's a possibility we'll be able to use V3LR preset even with ~69 perhaps, I think :beh:

Now I go out for a beer :huge: :potez: :bearsy:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Sat Jun 23, 2007 2:05 pm ]
Post subject: 
On my source, 73% comptest, gave undersizing with V3LR it seems the new one with few percent less will have proper sizer, I'll know tomorrow hopefully...

So if anyone gets a comptest within that range please test. I know some of you are avoiding it for reasons unknown :fouet: :fouet: :fouet:
Author:  elguaxo [ Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:46 pm ]
Post subject: 
The Hidden Fortress - 1/2DVD - 73% - LUX-60. Let's see...
Author:  Lux Delux [ Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:47 am ]
Post subject: 
Well first I have to :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow: for the movie choice :bow: :bow: :bow: :bow:

Good to know the comptest was above 70 :cheer:

I guess it would be good if it undersizes, giving you a chance to use a higher quality matrix.

Though I dunno if MPEG would be IT :crazy2:
Author:  Vae Victis [ Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:00 pm ]
Post subject: 
Code:
"Checking Source...."
The system cannot execute the specified program.
Error checking source - avsutil.exe cannot play the avs script.
Press any key to continue . . .

o.O

que?
Author:  Vae Victis [ Sun Jun 24, 2007 2:09 pm ]
Post subject: 
Why isn't lux online all of the time?

btw, I've installed latest avisynth (linked in fp) as well.
Or do I need to change avs script itself?

[edit] getting this error when dragging avs on bat file (avs2qxvid_25f.bat)
Author:  Lux Delux [ Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:24 pm ]
Post subject: 
Hmmm strange, very strange :eek:

Can you open the script in vdubmod? If you can than the script should be fine.

Try removing xvidcore.dll from the bin folder, gives problems on some machines... :beh:
Page 3 of 20 All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/