So Bad It's Good
It is currently Sat Apr 27, 2024 9:49 am




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
 Which one looks better? 
Author Message
Anal Muffin
Anal Muffin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:27 am
Posts: 6147
Reply with quote
Post Which one looks better?
Have 2 rips 1 1/2 and 1 1/3 sized and made some screenshots.

Which one looks better top or bottom?
Image
Image
Image

Image
Image
Image

Image
Image
Image

Image
Image
Image

Image
Image
Image

Curious what you guys have to say about it.


Last edited by Vae Victis on Tue Oct 31, 2006 9:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:05 pm
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
To me the lower ones seem a bit better. But nothing drastic. I'm satisfied with both so 1/3 is my vote :cheer:


Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:08 pm
Profile
Veggie Fridge
Veggie Fridge
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 2:59 pm
Posts: 21656
Location: Fuck You! GoodBye!
Reply with quote
Post 
Lux Delux wrote:
To me the lower ones seem a bit better. But nothing drastic. I'm satisfied with both so 1/3 is my vote :cheer:


Couldn't have said it better :good:


Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:11 pm
Profile
Anal Muffin
Anal Muffin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:27 am
Posts: 6147
Reply with quote
Post 
Specs for the 1/3 one is:
Code:
FILE_NAME                      freejack_1.avi
FILE_NAME_WITH_PATH            H:\FREEJACK\VIDEO_TS\freejack_1.avi
FILE_SIZE                      1,562,445,824
CONT_BASETYPE                  AVI(.AVI)
CONT_SUBTYPE                   OpenDML (AVI v2.0),
CONT_INTERLEAVE_TIME           42
CONT_INTERLEAVE_PRELOAD        512
CONT_INTERLEAVE_ALIGN          Split
CONT_TOTAL_BITRATE             0
CONT_BYTES_MISSING             0
CONT_AUDIO_STREAM_COUNT        1
VIDEO_CODEC_TYPE               xvid
VIDEO_CODEC_NAME               XviD
VIDEO_CODEC_STATUS             Codec(s) are Installed
VIDEO_DURATION                 01:49:32
VIDEO_FRAME_COUNT              157569
VIDEO_QF                       0.294
VIDEO_SIZE_X                   704
VIDEO_SIZE_Y                   304
VIDEO_PICS_PER_SEC             23.976
VIDEO_FRAMES_PER_SEC           23.976
VIDEO_BITRATE                  1511
VIDEO_MPEG4                    MPEG-4
VIDEO_MPEG4_BVOP               B-VOP
VIDEO_MPEG4_NVOP               N-VOP
VIDEO_MPEG4_QPEL               QPel
VIDEO_MPEG4_GMC                GMC
VIDEO_DAR                      2.316

Top one is the 1/3 dvd rip, bottom one is 1/2 rip (wel almost a 1/2 dvd rips it's oversized by 60MB)

The only thing I can see which is different is the color of skin, but can't really decide which is better.


Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:15 pm
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
1/3 sounds great. 1/2 would be overkill IMO since there's no drastic quality change. At least to me :cheer:


Last edited by Lux Delux on Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:17 pm
Profile
Veggie Fridge
Veggie Fridge
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 2:59 pm
Posts: 21656
Location: Fuck You! GoodBye!
Reply with quote
Post 
The only thing that appears to be better in the secons screens is the contrast IMO. The darker parts look a bit better


Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:17 pm
Profile
Anal Muffin
Anal Muffin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:27 am
Posts: 6147
Reply with quote
Post 
Do have to mention that 1/3 does have qpel and gmc.
As long as that isn't a problem (not to me) I'll put that one as a release version.

And doesn't Emilio have a nice but? :jerkit:


Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:22 pm
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
Vae Victis wrote:
Do have to mention that 1/3 does have qpel and gmc.
As long as that isn't a problem (not to me) I'll put that one as a release version.


Doesn't matter to me too, some wankers will hate it though, fuckers :jerkit:

Vae Victis wrote:
And doesn't Emilio have a nice but? :jerkit:


Uhuh :wack:


Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:25 pm
Profile
Beer with Rum
Beer with Rum
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:08 am
Posts: 279
Reply with quote
Post 
The bottom ones look better yes emilio has a great butt! :)

_________________
B movies are best when watched with friends. Image


Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:00 pm
Profile
Official ShitLover
Official ShitLover
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:48 pm
Posts: 8893
Location: not to be found
Reply with quote
Post 
azumi_yo wrote:
The bottom ones look better yes emilio has a great butt! :)


Maybe, but Mick Jagger's is much more available :burst:

_________________
Bolje piva u ruci nego pi?ka na grani.


Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:21 am
Profile
Sabrina the Witch
Sabrina the Witch

Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:41 pm
Posts: 4800
Location: Metalchussetts, The Altered State of Druggachussetts
Reply with quote
Post 
Judging by the screens, IMO, you should do 1/3rd and NO qpel gmc with a sharper matrix and/or sharpening filters and maybe some MSmooth set lightly. The A/R looks perfect to me.


Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:05 am
Profile
Anal Muffin
Anal Muffin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:27 am
Posts: 6147
Reply with quote
Post 
Already tried some sharpening filters, but results really looked crap.
Got lots of halos with it. Although I do agree it could use some sharpening.

with sharper matrix you mean jawor 2cd?

And why not qpel/gmc? Not really sure if I could get the same or better results without it.
Plus the only reason for not using it seems standalone compatibility and thats only old ones.
Can always give it another run off course :)


Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:24 am
Profile
Sabrina the Witch
Sabrina the Witch

Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:41 pm
Posts: 4800
Location: Metalchussetts, The Altered State of Druggachussetts
Reply with quote
Post 
Its strains stability of you system more without much benefit at medium bitrates (~1500), it helps sharpen motion I guess but its a pain in the ass.


Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:18 pm
Profile
Anal Muffin
Anal Muffin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:27 am
Posts: 6147
Reply with quote
Post 
Added a third picture in the first post.
Hell of a job getting the correct frames :D

Last one is a 1/3 job without qpel/gmc but degrainmedian and limitedsharpenfaster.

It sucks, can clearly see some artifacts showing up and loss of details (look at tires in second shot).
So going to redo the 1/2 one, which is the one looking the best of the 3.

_________________
Got milk?


Tue Oct 31, 2006 9:53 pm
Profile
Sabrina the Witch
Sabrina the Witch

Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:41 pm
Posts: 4800
Location: Metalchussetts, The Altered State of Druggachussetts
Reply with quote
Post 
The loss of detail is due to degrainmedian, try RemoveGrain instead, with a mode setting of 3. Works great everytime.


Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:08 pm
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
:wank:


Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:28 am
Profile
Sabrina the Witch
Sabrina the Witch

Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:41 pm
Posts: 4800
Location: Metalchussetts, The Altered State of Druggachussetts
Reply with quote
Post 
Or that'll work too.


Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:05 am
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
grInd wrote:
Or that'll work too.


Yeah I know I was fucking around with the rips too much before. Then I just decided to wack it good :jiz:


Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:44 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 106 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: