So Bad It's Good
It is currently Wed May 01, 2024 11:26 am




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 587 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 20  Next
 avs2xvid.bat with Lux presets 
Author Message
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
So which one was for the last screen? :fishy: :nose:


Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:58 pm
Profile
Zombie Soup
Zombie Soup
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:14 pm
Posts: 196
Reply with quote
Post 
Last one is SeeSaw so 109


Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:14 am
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
I don't have much experience in that range, but try LUX-85 anyways even though it could undersize, it's worth a shot if it doesn't cause you'll have awesome quants!

Or you could raise the sharpening very very slightly up or lower the denoising by little.

Dunno if V3 would be too much for that comptest aka LUX-90... Lemme know of the results :cheer:

im off to bed :paca:


Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:22 am
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
If you decide to encode with that script that is. Fuck I dunno what Im saying anymore, not enuf sleep :lol:


Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:25 am
Profile
Zombie Soup
Zombie Soup
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:14 pm
Posts: 196
Reply with quote
Post 
I'll give it a whirl and post results. :D


Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:17 pm
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
Hmmm I didn't notice this in my other encodes, the encode is a bit darker than the .avs, like it lost contrast or something.

Checking now if it's Chroma-ME :non:


Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:53 pm
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
Oh I guess it's a normal xvid effect, removing chromaME or vhq for b-frames don't change a thing.

Doesn't matter though, the impact is negligible, I just like to nitpick over poop :cum:


Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:12 pm
Profile
Zombie Soup
Zombie Soup
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:14 pm
Posts: 196
Reply with quote
Post 
Here's the report:

Code:
DivX DRF Analyzer v0.9.5 Report!
File Name: C:\_Babycart6\white.avi
FourCC: XVID
Codec: XviD0046
Resolution: [ Width: 720 Height: 304 ]
Frame Rate: 23.976 frames per second
The Video has 120183 frames [ 01:23:32 ]

Average Frame quality is  HIGH   [Average DRF/quantizer is 2.65]
Standard Deviation: Quality is HIGH   [Std. Deviation is 0.57]
Image Resolution is HIGH

There are NO frame drops ( NO drops is better )

Recomended Resolution: [736x304]    (Target DRF/quantizer=2.8)
The filesize can be smaller!

Performance Caracteristics:
Macroblocks per frame: 855
The Width is not multiple of 32. May degrade performance in some systems.

Kilobits per Second: 2241.40
Kilobits per Frame: 93.47
Kilobits per Macroblock: 0.109
Bits per Pixel: 0.44

Frame Type Statistics :
I Frames: 1.10%
P Frames: 51.82%
B Frames: 47.08%
S Frames: 0.00%
N Frames: 0.00%
(More Advanced Codecs use B and S frames)
Frame Quality Statistics :

DRF=1&2:   47776   40.2%
DRF=3:      65378   55.0%
DRF=4:      5707   4.8%
DRF=5:      0   0.0%
DRF=6:      0   0.0%
DRF=7:      0   0.0%
DRF=8:      0   0.0%
DRF=9:      0   0.0%
DRF>9:      0   0.0%
KeyF/DeltaF:      1.11%
KeyDRF<4>4:   0

AverageKeyDRF:   2.00
MAXDRF:   4
AverageDRF:   2.65
Deviation:   0.57

http://www.geocities.com/analyzerDRF/


Sat Jul 28, 2007 5:49 pm
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
Those seem to be pretty steamy!!!!

You should use avinaptic though for analysis, it's awesome ;)

http://forum.doom9.org/showthread.php?p ... post966470


Sat Jul 28, 2007 5:54 pm
Profile
Zombie Soup
Zombie Soup
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:14 pm
Posts: 196
Reply with quote
Post 
Just a quickie: I'm not sure if there's a small problem with the LUX-CT function. I tried it out, and from its own results it gave Comptest = 108, which should use LUX-85. However, when I used LUX-CT it chose to use LUX-90 which resulted in an oversized file.

Don't know if something needs tweaking?


Sat Aug 04, 2007 11:02 am
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
Yes, for now don't use LUX-CT, it worked fine previously but then I removed the modifications elguaxo or something :teeth:

COMPTEST normally is your way into paradise :cum: :lol:


Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:12 am
Profile
Zombie Soup
Zombie Soup
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:14 pm
Posts: 196
Reply with quote
Post 
OK, so I got an undersize with the batch file. :non:

LUX-90 gave me 1.58GB

LUX-85 gave me 1.44GB

Can you make a LUX-87.5 preset please. :D


Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:35 pm
Profile
End of Level Boss
End of Level Boss
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:10 pm
Posts: 7535
Reply with quote
Post 
I also got undersizing with older versions of LUX-85.

Replace lines 37 and 38 in xvid_presets_25h.csv with this:

Code:
"LUX-85","1","4","1",".",".","1","100","100","v3hr-sap.xcm","3",".",".",".",".",".",".",".",".",".","-10",".",".","Y","."
"LUX-85","2","6","4",".",".","1","100","100","v3hr-sap.xcm",".","2","3","2","4","2","4",".",".","0","-10","Y","Y",".","."


I don't know if these settings are good enough to replace the current LUX-85, but in your case you will hit the right filesize and have nice quants. I changed the B-VOP sensitivity to -10 (which is not too much).


Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:15 pm
Profile
Zombie Soup
Zombie Soup
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:14 pm
Posts: 196
Reply with quote
Post 
Thanks man, I'll give that a go.


Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:48 pm
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
So 85 is a stinker :lol:

Isn't -10 too much? I mean -3 lowers compressibility a lot :beh:

Perhaps better then to use heini? Heini 1/1/0 perhaps? Dunno if that would be in the 90 range though :stupid:


PS. thanks for the input! :good:


Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:20 pm
Profile
End of Level Boss
End of Level Boss
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:10 pm
Posts: 7535
Reply with quote
Post 
Lux Delux wrote:
So 85 is a stinker :lol:

Isn't -10 too much?


I had an undersize similar to ViSCeRaL and -3 was too little. I am sure he will get some 4s, but that's ok! Another problem might be the OCS=0 parameter!? I haven't played around with that parameter, so I don't know... Perhaps with OCS=0 it is not picking enough 2s to fill the target size?

ViSCeRaL, don't forget to post the full avinaptic report, drf stats included!

Edit: another solution could be doing the first pass at Q=2. With Is/Ps/Bs at min=2 the difference between a first pass at q=2 or 3 is that at q=2 you get more Q2 frames than when you do the first pass at q=3.


Last edited by elguaxo on Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:45 pm
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
So maybe

heini 1/1/1 with -3 b-vops and min Q=2 at first pass would be enough to bring the compression down to make it a good 85 alternative?

I presume it certainly loses compression with Q=2 at first pass? If not much then we stick with V3HR, but anywayz we need tests :D

Hmmmm this opens new possibilities :)


Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:56 pm
Profile
End of Level Boss
End of Level Boss
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:10 pm
Posts: 7535
Reply with quote
Post 
I still haven't finished the V encode. It was the encode where I got undersizes with LUX-85. Will try a 1/1/1 with -3 b-vops and Q=2 at first pass.

_________________
Old2New SBiG URL Replacement Script | SBiG searchplugin
my AviSynth Plugins folder | Show Just Image 2 | Doom10


Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:58 pm
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
Awesome! :cheer: :cheer:


Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:59 pm
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
Interesting, seems Bloodrayne is around this league with about 100 and something little comptest :beh:

Guess I'll wait for your results. ;) And Im always fishy thinking bout V3 matrix, I've another one with 117 comptest. Hmmm I'll run a small comparison test :cum:


Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:31 am
Profile
Zombie Soup
Zombie Soup
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:14 pm
Posts: 196
Reply with quote
Post 
elguaxo wrote:
ViSCeRaL, don't forget to post the full avinaptic report, drf stats included!


Will do. I'm running a different encode ATM, so when I go back to the problem one I'll post up results.


Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:48 pm
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
We gotta fill that hole :ele: :ele: :ele:


Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:35 pm
Profile
Zombie Soup
Zombie Soup
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:14 pm
Posts: 196
Reply with quote
Post 
Dammit! Still undersized even with the adjustments elguaxo suggested. :(

Off on holiday for a coupleof weeks now, I'll do some more beta testing when I get back. :lol:


Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:48 pm
Profile
End of Level Boss
End of Level Boss
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:10 pm
Posts: 7535
Reply with quote
Post 
I am running tests on a movie with similar problems. I will have a new LUX-85 when you are back.

Lux I told you, a B-VOP sensitivity of -10 is not too much! :lol:

_________________
Old2New SBiG URL Replacement Script | SBiG searchplugin
my AviSynth Plugins folder | Show Just Image 2 | Doom10


Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:53 pm
Profile
Zombie Soup
Zombie Soup
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 5:14 pm
Posts: 196
Reply with quote
Post 
ViSCeRaL wrote:
elguaxo wrote:
ViSCeRaL, don't forget to post the full avinaptic report, drf stats included!


Will do. I'm running a different encode ATM, so when I go back to the problem one I'll post up results.


Here we go:

Code:
[ About file ]

Name: msp.avi
Date: 10/08/2007 15:33:04
Size: 1,552,578,560 bytes (1480.654 MB)

[ Generic info ]

Play duration: 01:30:56 (5455.538872 s)
Container type: AVI OpenDML
Number of streams: 2
Type of stream nr. 0: video
Type of stream nr. 1: audio
Audio streams: 1
ISFT: VirtualDubMod 1.5.10.2 (build 2540/release)
JUNK: VirtualDubMod build 2540/release

[ About quality ]

Resolution: HIGH (704 x 368)
Width: multiple of 16 (GOOD)
Height: multiple of 16 (GOOD)
Average DRF quality: HIGH (2.612911)
Standard deviation quality: HIGH (0.573018)
Std. dev. weighted mean: HIGH (0.346056)

[ Video track ]

FourCC: xvid/XVID
Resolution: 704 x 368
Frame aspect ratio: 44:23 = 1.913043
Pixel aspect ratio: 1:1 = 1
Display aspect ratio: 44:23 = 1.913043
Framerate: 23.976 fps
Number of frames: 130802
Stream size: 1,242,754,352 bytes
Bitrate: 1822.374480 kbps
Qf: 0.293386
Key frames: 1616 (0; 156; 259; 371; 372; ... 130778)
Null frames: 0
Min key int: 1
Max key int: 240
Avg key int: 80.941831
Delay: 0 ms

[ Audio track ]

Audio tag: 0x2000 (AC3)
Bitrate: 448 kbps CBR
Channels: 6
Sample rate: 48000 Hz
Chunks: 56775
Stream size: 305,245,696 bytes
Delay: 0 ms

[ About MPEG4 encoding ]

User data: XviD0046
Packed bitstream: No
QPel: No
GMC: No
Interlaced: No
Aspect ratio: Square pixels
Quant type: MPEG custom (*)
Custom intra quant matrix:
      8  10  10  10  11  11  13  15
     10  10  10  10  11  12  14  16
     10  10  11  11  13  14  16  18
     10  10  11  13  15  17  19  23
     11  11  13  15  19  22  26  29
     11  12  14  17  22  28  34  41
     13  14  16  19  26  34  44  55
     15  16  18  23  29  41  55  72
Custom inter quant matrix:
     16  16  16  16  16  17  19  22
     16  16  16  16  16  18  20  23
     16  16  16  17  19  20  23  27
     16  16  17  19  22  25  29  33
     16  16  19  22  28  32  38  43
     17  18  20  25  32  41  50  60
     19  20  23  29  38  50  66  81
     22  23  27  33  43  60  81 106
Number of frames: 130802
Drop/delay frames: 0
Corrupted frames: 0

I-VOPs:  1616 (  1.235 %)                         
P-VOPs: 68294 ( 52.212 %) #############           
B-VOPs: 60892 ( 46.553 %) ############             
S-VOPs:     0 (  0.000 %)                         
N-VOPs:     0 (  0.000 %)                         

Max consecutive B-VOPs: 1

[ DRF analysis ]

Average DRF: 2.612911
Standard deviation: 0.573018
Max DRF: 4

DRF"<"2:     0 (  0.000 %)                         
DRF=2: 56590 ( 43.264 %) ###########             
DRF=3: 68254 ( 52.181 %) #############           
DRF=4:  5958 (  4.555 %) #                       
DRF">"4:     0 (  0.000 %)                         

I-VOPs average DRF: 2.005569
I-VOPs std. deviation: 0.074419
I-VOPs max DRF: 3

P-VOPs average DRF: 2.194907
P-VOPs std. deviation: 0.396129
P-VOPs max DRF: 3

B-VOPs average DRF: 3.097845
B-VOPs std. deviation: 0.297105
B-VOPs max DRF: 4

This report was created by AVInaptic (10-04-2007) on 22 ago 2007, h 13:08:14


Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:09 pm
Profile
Veggie Fridge
Veggie Fridge
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 2:59 pm
Posts: 21656
Location: Fuck You! GoodBye!
Reply with quote
Post 
Specs look pretty good to me :good: I wonder what gx has to say...

Code:
Average DRF: 2.612911


= good AFAIR

Some screens maybe, or even a sample?
:cheer:


Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:36 pm
Profile
End of Level Boss
End of Level Boss
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:10 pm
Posts: 7535
Reply with quote
Post 
Looks great but undersized. I'm still working on a new LUX-85 preset! My undersize encode of V using LUX-85 looks like yours: http://bad-good.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=65948#65948

_________________
Old2New SBiG URL Replacement Script | SBiG searchplugin
my AviSynth Plugins folder | Show Just Image 2 | Doom10


Wed Aug 22, 2007 10:45 pm
Profile
Chuck Norris
Chuck Norris
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm
Posts: 16726
Location: Shitopia
Reply with quote
Post 
What's this I hear about a new LUX-85 ^^

I've been without monitors for 2 weeks ya know :beh:


Sun Aug 26, 2007 8:34 pm
Profile
Sperm Donation Bank
Sperm Donation Bank
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 10:18 pm
Posts: 602
Reply with quote
Post Re: avs2xvid.bat with Lux presets
Lux Delux wrote:
3) inside the .txt file write

Code:
COMPTEST sizeMB


where size is the size of your video, like 1162MB for example.


Sorry for being thick :beh:
The size of my video? do you mean the size I want my rip to be? how big it is in vobs beforehand? or even how many mb I want to use for a comptest?

_________________
Image


Fri Sep 07, 2007 12:39 pm
Profile
Veggie Fridge
Veggie Fridge
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 2:59 pm
Posts: 21656
Location: Fuck You! GoodBye!
Reply with quote
Post 
Yeah, the size of your rip. Or you can enter the bitrate there instead of MB


Fri Sep 07, 2007 1:33 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 587 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 20  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 87 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: