So Bad It's Good FoRuM
https://sbig.dead-donkey.com/

avs2xvid.bat with Lux presets
https://sbig.dead-donkey.com/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=8128		 Page 7 of 20
Author:  elguaxo [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:46 am ]
Post subject: 
:eek: :rocko: Impressive!
Author:  Pure [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:47 am ]
Post subject: 
:good:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:52 am ]
Post subject: 
As I already said, you can't go wrong with Didee stuff ^^ :ele:

I'll know how much compressibility it gives or takes away in a few mins.

I gotta remember this combo for future clean sources :rocko: :rocko: :rocko: :rocko:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:07 am ]
Post subject: 
Compressibility seems to be the same, at least with DOA, filtered vs. unfiltered. Oh well :cum:
Author:  Vae Victis [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:16 am ]
Post subject: 
Looks a bit better indeed.
Author:  Lux Delux [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:21 am ]
Post subject: 
If LUX-90 really does go well with it meaning it doesn't oversize, then I think you'd have something very steamy and hot :eek: :wack:
Author:  Vae Victis [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:36 am ]
Post subject: 
We'll see. Have 3 scripts running atm.
1 lux-80 with bare avs script
1 lux-90 with qx script
1 lux-90 with lux script

If this does look hot and shiny I'll need to redo some rips.. Rest of James Bond are also of pretty good quality.

And I definatly need to grab me some sleep...

Also curious what your presets can do on Cronos. still didn't ripped that one properly.

ugh sleeeeeep
Author:  Lux Delux [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:37 am ]
Post subject: 
Yeah I also need to sleep, also gotta work tomorrow, though it's holiday here :(

Looking forward to the results! :bisou: :dance:
Author:  Vae Victis [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:42 am ]
Post subject: 
Umn, I think I'll just change the script and let it use 1 thread. I think it would be faster when running multiple encodes at the same time.
That way each can grab it's own core. Atleast in theory.
Author:  Vae Victis [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:44 pm ]
Post subject: 
LUX-80 gave correct filesize and high drf stats. Little screen to compare to the lux 70
LUX-70
Image
LUX-80
Image
No difference at all, afaics.

Hope the LUX-90 versions aren't too big.
Author:  elguaxo [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:35 pm ]
Post subject: 
I think the dehalo script of Lux is the way to go. If the chroma denoising is good, then you could try to mix them both like this:
Code:
Spline36Resize(704,416)
dehalo_alpha(rx=1.8,ry=1.8)

a=last
b=a.degrainmedian(mode=5).FFT3DFilter(sigma=2.5,bt=4,plane=3)
SeeSaw(a,b, NRlimit=3, NRlimit2=4, Sstr=1.5, Slimit=1, Spower=2, soothes=60, soothet=60, Sdamplo=6, Szp=16)
Author:  Vae Victis [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:10 pm ]
Post subject: 
Added it to encoding spree.
Using LUX-80 with this, think LUX-90 is going to oversize bigtime.
Quote:
xvid [info]: outputting statistics to F:\bond\001\tmp\001clean4.stats
Trying to retrieve width and height from input header
xvid [info]: Avisynth detected
xvid [info]: Input colorspace is YV12
xvid [info]: Input is 704 x 416, 25.000fps (25000/1000), starting from frame 0
xvid [info]: Number of frames to encode: 157829, Bitrate = 2521kbps
xvid [info]: xvidcore build version: xvid-1.2.0-dev
xvid [info]: Bitstream version: 1.2.-127
xvid [info]: Detected CPU flags: ASM MMX MMXEXT SSE SSE2 TSC
xvid [info]: Detected cpus = 4, threads requested = 4, threads in use = 4
108001 frames( 68%) encoded, 7.91 fps, Average Bitrate = 2643kbps

That is if I read it correctly.
Author:  Lux Delux [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:22 pm ]
Post subject: 
Remember if youre using my Dehalo combination, it should have about the same compressibility as unfiltered, so it would probably be best with LUX-80 ;)

Currently at work, managed to grab some internetz!!! :pooper:

Elguaxo I cant currently see the result with what you added, but maybe then sharpening should be increased a bit? Dunno how it affects the picture. :beh:

Oh and Vae that isn/t that big a difference between bitrates I think. UNless it goes even higher. We/ll see.


At home I have 2 with Lux-95 :eek:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:34 pm ]
Post subject: 
Or unless that was the first pass you posted? :eek:

Anyways yesterday I did make preset updates, I hope to upload the shit tonight :cum:
Author:  Vae Victis [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 3:57 pm ]
Post subject: 
No it's the second pass. but atm the average bitrate is already below the bitrate again.
It's buttslow though.
Author:  Lux Delux [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:13 pm ]
Post subject: 
Yes it fluctuates quite a bit.

You can do a rough calculation

Take the total frames, divide it with current frames and then multiply with the current encode size :teeth:
Author:  Vae Victis [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:17 pm ]
Post subject: 
I use a rougher calculation.

I just take the current filesize of the encode, divide it by the percentage it's on. And multiply it with 100.
Author:  Lux Delux [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:18 pm ]
Post subject: 
youre nasty :cum: :teeth:
Author:  Vae Victis [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:19 pm ]
Post subject: 
Code:
crop(22,4,676,568)
spline36resize(704,416)
FFT3DFilter(sigma=2.5,bt=4,plane=3)

Gave me: (LUX-90)
Image
vs (no extra filters+LUX-80)
Image
Can't say it has improved on the artifacts. But might be that the colors are a bit better or it's just a bit darker. But that could just be me. Also can't really judge that on a tft.

Stil waiting for:
Code:
crop(22,4,676,568)
spline36resize(704,416)
dehalo_alpha(rx=1.8,ry=1.8)
a= last
b=a.degrainmedian(mode=5).FFT3DFilter(sigma=2.5,bt=4,plane=3)
SeeSaw(a,b, NRlimit=3, NRlimit2=4, Sstr=1.5, Slimit=1, Spower=2, soothes=60, soothet=60, Sdamplo=6, Szp=16)

And one without the fft3dfilter.

btw: LUX-90 gave me same filesize as LUX-80.
Author:  elguaxo [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:32 pm ]
Post subject: 
The red parts have not improved much. Red is tricky indeed, there are many Doom9 threads about it, none of them has a definitive solution. But...

At this level chroma denoising does not hurt details but improves compressibility, so you were able to use a better preset and I like the LUX-90 results better:

LUX-90 + FFT3DFilter:
Image

LUX-80, no filtering:
Image

Edit: I guess the dehalo script by lux + some chroma denosing will be the winner.
Author:  Vae Victis [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:50 pm ]
Post subject: 
If you zoom in that much and I'd have to be really honest. I'd have to choose the bottom one.
Look at the left part of the image, the top one has more irregularities than the bottom one.
But when just watching it at normal size, I'd say the top one. Cause it's a bit darker and colors seem somewhat better.

screengrab from the avs (not same frame, but close I think) I just mentioned I was waiting for. Both LUX-80 & LUX-90 are running atm.
Image
^^looks spiffy :cum:
Author:  elguaxo [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:55 pm ]
Post subject: 
Zooming is tricky. But LUX-90 is keeping more details, irregularities included:

LUX-90 + FFT3DFilter
Image

LUX-80, no filtering
Image
Author:  Vae Victis [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:59 pm ]
Post subject: 
:gne:
Didn't look at that this way...
That is indeed better. yummie

[edit] wrinkles :ele: :cum:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:15 pm ]
Post subject: 
I dunno why, could be cause of having 2 avs2xvid folders of different versions, but I had 2 encodes done but not finished. The avi's were not finished and corrupted. WTF?

I'm using the new one now, first job had average bitrate calculated wrong for reasons unknown. Encoding it with set bitrate now.... Dunno why it calculated it wrongly. :fouet:

Hope the avi's won't be corrupt this time :spank:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:49 pm ]
Post subject: 
So comptest 110 didn't undersize with LUX-90? KEWL! Giving it a shot with comptest 114 right now then!
Author:  Vae Victis [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:06 pm ]
Post subject: 
Talking to me?
Author:  Lux Delux [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:10 pm ]
Post subject: 
I'm talking to myself but you're my sex toy :D

Your encode gave me a bit clearer view on the usage of 90 preset. What I need to find out now is the difference of it between 85 :beh:
Author:  Vae Victis [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:12 pm ]
Post subject: 
ohw, well glad that cleared things up.. waaaait I'm YOUR WHAT? :crzy:
Author:  Lux Delux [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 9:30 pm ]
Post subject: 
nuthin nuthin :teeth:
Author:  Pure [ Mon Jun 25, 2007 10:11 pm ]
Post subject: 
Here's one with a 'clean' avs, no filters used:
avs: sgtkab
Code:
#  PLUGINS
LoadPlugin("G:\GordianKnot\Gordian Knot 0.35.0 pack2\DGMPGDec\DGDecode.dll")
LoadPlugin("G:\GordianKnot\Gordian Knot 0.35.0 pack2\AviSynthPlugins\decomb.dll")
#LoadPlugin("G:\GordianKnot\Gordian Knot 0.35.0 pack2\AviSynthPlugins\KernelDeInt.dll")
LoadPlugin("G:\GordianKnot\Gordian Knot 0.35.0 pack2\AviSynthPlugins\UnDot.dll")
#LoadPlugin("G:\GordianKnot\Gordian Knot 0.35.0 pack2\AviSynthPlugins\dgbob.dll")
#LoadPlugin("G:\GordianKnot\Gordian Knot 0.35.0 pack2\AviSynthPlugins\Convolution3d.dll")
#LoadPlugin("G:\GordianKnot\Gordian Knot 0.35.0 pack2\AviSynthPlugins\FluxSmooth.dll")
#LoadPlugin("G:\GordianKnot\Gordian Knot 0.35.0 pack2\AviSynthPlugins\TomsMoComp.dll")
#LoadPlugin("G:\GordianKnot\Gordian Knot 0.35.0 pack2\AviSynthPlugins\VSFilter.dll")
#LoadPlugin("G:\GordianKnot\Gordian Knot 0.35.0 pack2\AviSynthPlugins\SimpleResize.dll")

#  SOURCE
mpeg2source("G:\ShitBusters\Shitbusters Rips\Sgt Kabikiman NYPD\d2v\VTS_01_1.d2v")

#  DEINTERLACING (1)
FieldDeinterlace()

#  CROPPING
crop(28,4,682,560)

#  RESIZING
LanczosResize(704,528)

#  DENOISING: choose one combination (or none)
Undot()



Target file size 1/3 DVD
Code:
ma 25-06-2007 21:55:14,37 - Checking Source
ma 25-06-2007 21:55:19,64 - Testing Compressibility
ma 25-06-2007 21:55:19,65 - Encoding Single Pass
start "3% Compressibility Test - Single Pass" /b /wait /belownormal "G:\avs2qxvid\bin\xvid_encraw_20070203.exe"  -zones 0,w,1,KO -threads 1 -progress 100 -overhead 0 -max_key_interval 250 -nopacked -quality 4 -vhqmode 0 -max_bframes 2 -bquant_ratio 162 -bquant_offset 0 -qtype 1 -qmatrix "G:\avs2qxvid\matrix\Didees-SixOfNine.cqm" -nochromame -turbo -single -cq 3 -stats "G:\ShitBusters\Shitbusters Rips\Sgt Kabikiman NYPD\avs\tmp\sgtkab.ct.stats" -type 2 -i "G:\ShitBusters\Shitbusters Rips\Sgt Kabikiman NYPD\avs\sgtkab.ct.avs" -avi "G:\ShitBusters\Shitbusters Rips\Sgt Kabikiman NYPD\avs\sgtkab.ct.avi"
Source FPS              = 25000/1000
No. of frames for CT    = 5360
Size of selected frames = 116384693
Target Size in KB       = 1528832KB
ma 25-06-2007 22:05:03,56 - Comptest = 46
ma 25-06-2007 22:05:03,56 - Level = 30
ma 25-06-2007 22:05:03,68 - Loading Preset
Page 7 of 20 All times are UTC + 1 hour [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/