Author |
Message |
Vae Victis
Anal Muffin
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:27 am Posts: 6147
|
Which one looks better?
Last edited by Vae Victis on Tue Oct 31, 2006 9:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:05 pm |
|
|
Lux Delux
Chuck Norris
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm Posts: 16726 Location: Shitopia
|
To me the lower ones seem a bit better. But nothing drastic. I'm satisfied with both so 1/3 is my vote
|
Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:08 pm |
|
|
Pure
Veggie Fridge
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 2:59 pm Posts: 21656 Location: Fuck You! GoodBye!
|
Lux Delux wrote: To me the lower ones seem a bit better. But nothing drastic. I'm satisfied with both so 1/3 is my vote
Couldn't have said it better
|
Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:11 pm |
|
|
Vae Victis
Anal Muffin
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:27 am Posts: 6147
|
Specs for the 1/3 one is:
Code: FILE_NAME freejack_1.avi FILE_NAME_WITH_PATH H:\FREEJACK\VIDEO_TS\freejack_1.avi FILE_SIZE 1,562,445,824 CONT_BASETYPE AVI(.AVI) CONT_SUBTYPE OpenDML (AVI v2.0), CONT_INTERLEAVE_TIME 42 CONT_INTERLEAVE_PRELOAD 512 CONT_INTERLEAVE_ALIGN Split CONT_TOTAL_BITRATE 0 CONT_BYTES_MISSING 0 CONT_AUDIO_STREAM_COUNT 1 VIDEO_CODEC_TYPE xvid VIDEO_CODEC_NAME XviD VIDEO_CODEC_STATUS Codec(s) are Installed VIDEO_DURATION 01:49:32 VIDEO_FRAME_COUNT 157569 VIDEO_QF 0.294 VIDEO_SIZE_X 704 VIDEO_SIZE_Y 304 VIDEO_PICS_PER_SEC 23.976 VIDEO_FRAMES_PER_SEC 23.976 VIDEO_BITRATE 1511 VIDEO_MPEG4 MPEG-4 VIDEO_MPEG4_BVOP B-VOP VIDEO_MPEG4_NVOP N-VOP VIDEO_MPEG4_QPEL QPel VIDEO_MPEG4_GMC GMC VIDEO_DAR 2.316
Top one is the 1/3 dvd rip, bottom one is 1/2 rip (wel almost a 1/2 dvd rips it's oversized by 60MB)
The only thing I can see which is different is the color of skin, but can't really decide which is better.
|
Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:15 pm |
|
|
Lux Delux
Chuck Norris
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm Posts: 16726 Location: Shitopia
|
1/3 sounds great. 1/2 would be overkill IMO since there's no drastic quality change. At least to me
Last edited by Lux Delux on Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:17 pm |
|
|
Pure
Veggie Fridge
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 2:59 pm Posts: 21656 Location: Fuck You! GoodBye!
|
The only thing that appears to be better in the secons screens is the contrast IMO. The darker parts look a bit better
|
Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:17 pm |
|
|
Vae Victis
Anal Muffin
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:27 am Posts: 6147
|
Do have to mention that 1/3 does have qpel and gmc.
As long as that isn't a problem (not to me) I'll put that one as a release version.
And doesn't Emilio have a nice but?
|
Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:22 pm |
|
|
Lux Delux
Chuck Norris
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm Posts: 16726 Location: Shitopia
|
Vae Victis wrote: Do have to mention that 1/3 does have qpel and gmc. As long as that isn't a problem (not to me) I'll put that one as a release version. Doesn't matter to me too, some wankers will hate it though, fuckers Vae Victis wrote: And doesn't Emilio have a nice but?
Uhuh
|
Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:25 pm |
|
|
azumi_yo
Beer with Rum
Joined: Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:08 am Posts: 279
|
The bottom ones look better yes emilio has a great butt!
_________________ B movies are best when watched with friends.
|
Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:00 pm |
|
|
gnollie
Official ShitLover
Joined: Sun Aug 20, 2006 7:48 pm Posts: 8893 Location: not to be found
|
azumi_yo wrote: The bottom ones look better yes emilio has a great butt!
Maybe, but Mick Jagger's is much more available
_________________ Bolje piva u ruci nego pi?ka na grani.
|
Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:21 am |
|
|
GRiND
Sabrina the Witch
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:41 pm Posts: 4800 Location: Metalchussetts, The Altered State of Druggachussetts
|
Judging by the screens, IMO, you should do 1/3rd and NO qpel gmc with a sharper matrix and/or sharpening filters and maybe some MSmooth set lightly. The A/R looks perfect to me.
|
Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:05 am |
|
|
Vae Victis
Anal Muffin
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:27 am Posts: 6147
|
Already tried some sharpening filters, but results really looked crap.
Got lots of halos with it. Although I do agree it could use some sharpening.
with sharper matrix you mean jawor 2cd?
And why not qpel/gmc? Not really sure if I could get the same or better results without it.
Plus the only reason for not using it seems standalone compatibility and thats only old ones.
Can always give it another run off course
|
Mon Oct 30, 2006 11:24 am |
|
|
GRiND
Sabrina the Witch
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:41 pm Posts: 4800 Location: Metalchussetts, The Altered State of Druggachussetts
|
Its strains stability of you system more without much benefit at medium bitrates (~1500), it helps sharpen motion I guess but its a pain in the ass.
|
Mon Oct 30, 2006 12:18 pm |
|
|
Vae Victis
Anal Muffin
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:27 am Posts: 6147
|
Added a third picture in the first post.
Hell of a job getting the correct frames
Last one is a 1/3 job without qpel/gmc but degrainmedian and limitedsharpenfaster.
It sucks, can clearly see some artifacts showing up and loss of details (look at tires in second shot).
So going to redo the 1/2 one, which is the one looking the best of the 3.
_________________ Got milk?
|
Tue Oct 31, 2006 9:53 pm |
|
|
GRiND
Sabrina the Witch
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:41 pm Posts: 4800 Location: Metalchussetts, The Altered State of Druggachussetts
|
The loss of detail is due to degrainmedian, try RemoveGrain instead, with a mode setting of 3. Works great everytime.
|
Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:08 pm |
|
|
Lux Delux
Chuck Norris
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm Posts: 16726 Location: Shitopia
|
|
Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:28 am |
|
|
GRiND
Sabrina the Witch
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 2:41 pm Posts: 4800 Location: Metalchussetts, The Altered State of Druggachussetts
|
Or that'll work too.
|
Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:05 am |
|
|
Lux Delux
Chuck Norris
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:42 pm Posts: 16726 Location: Shitopia
|
grInd wrote: Or that'll work too.
Yeah I know I was fucking around with the rips too much before. Then I just decided to wack it good
|
Wed Nov 01, 2006 5:44 pm |
|
|
|